james's blog

Snipers And A Chain Of Patsies: The who and why of the Kiev shootings.

Nuland and Yanukovich enjoying social intercourse photo source

Almost immediately after an agreement sponsored by the European Foreign ministers was signed by Yanukovych and the Ukranian opposition parties, shooting broke out. It made no sense and still doesn't . . . . . unless you are aware of a third and a fourth force involved. The third force is the German government, chief amongst the negotiating European powers. And the fourth is the jewish neocons of the US together with their co-religionists in the political and economic spheres in Ukraine itself. These two forces are in a struggle over their different desires for the outcome in Ukraine. But first, let us backtrack a little.

The Maidan protests were made possible by the Right Sector (variously described as 'fascists' and Nazis') >paying unemployed workers and students from the impoverished western region of Ukraine to go to Kiev and protest. They were bused in by Right Sector thugs. These same thugs were armed and accompanied the protesters to 'protect' them from the police, they said.

Who provided the money? It is reasonable to assume it came from the US$5billion mentioned by the jewish neocon, Victoria Nuland.


A series of escalating violence from the protesters (chiefly the trained Right Sector thugs) ensued together with increasing concessions to the protesters from the Yanukovych government. Finally, Yanukovych agreed to an interim compromise government and an early election later this year. It was a capitulation and should have ended the violence then and there. But it didn't. It seemed instead to be a trigger for a shooting spree and armed takeover of the government. The following video has images of people being shot. So be prepard for this (or skip watching it).

The Long War of Terror

Here is a marvelous talk from Professor Michel Chossudovsky. He spells out the reality of the "War On Terror" and how it is actually a "War Of Terror" and has been for 60 years. This war of terror is aimed squarely at civilians and is by any measure the unltimate of war crimes.

Professor Chossudovsky's talk is entitled "Imperial Conquest: America’s Long War Against Humanity" -

Managing and Curing Metabolic Diseases Without Drugs (and a question of values)

Below are some videos that take two differing approaches to curing metabolic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's amongst others. These diseases can be managed successfully, and often cured outright, with what we feed the body both physically and mentally.

Much of this information, particularly relating to the benefits of the ketogenic diet, have been known to medical authorities for decades. Yet this invaluable information has not been transfered to the public at large. This brings in the question of values. What does this witholding of information say about the values of the medical profession?

In the talk by Dr. John Demartini, he explains very carefully how a persons behaviour illustrates their values and that when someone (or group) continues a destructive behaviour, it is always because they perceive they are gaining more than they are losing.

There is much more than this brief introduction in these videos. They are quite profound, in my view. World changing even, at least for some.

(My apologies for the formatting. I can't get the videos in a smaller frame despite the code indicating a much smaller size)

It is worth noting that in this first video, the presenter, Dr. Dominic D'Agostino explains that the medical profession uses the fact that cancer cells are heavily dependent on sugar to diagnose cancer but will not use this information, this weakness of cancer, to treat it.


The clip below includes footage from the film "First Do No Harm" about Charlie Abrahams experience at the hands of five pediatricians.


This lecture by Dr. John Demartini is wide ranging but ties a persons values to their health. He explains the physiological chain connecting these two things.
It is worth reflecting, too, on our sick society and what that says about our values.


Back With a Bang!


APea of Twelfth Bough is back after an extended hiatus with some fresh and enlightening writing. She ties together in in one neat article the demolition of the WTC Towers with subsequent false flag terror events and the continuing psychological warfare perpetrated on all of us that surrounds all this.

the reality-of-fakery last ditch effort

So I had to stop blogging and step back for a variety of reasons. I used the time gained to investigate some other corners of the internet, and some other issues, including 9/11. I had never devoted enough time to 9/11.

There is an opportunity cost to everything we do and pay attention to. Understanding is a process, a journey. We make mistakes, take detours, add data, then modify or firm up opinion as needed. One has to take risks to add value and move the personal and collective understanding closer to the TRUTH, which is the goal.

When a person who is honestly mistaken is confronted by the truth, that person either stops being mistaken or stops being honest. 911 University - College of Disinformation Recognition

The perpetrators of 9/11 have a different goal: to prevent discovery of the truth. They employ an army of minions to this end. They have many ways to encumber people. Sometimes it is obvious, and sometimes it is not. One can suspect but not be sure. It really comes down to seeing patterns over time.

In order to be good at Disinformation Recognition, it is very helpful to be good at Pattern Recognition, and necessary to be able to look at things differently. 911 University - College of Disinformation Recognition

By diverting our attention and wasting our time, they obscure the truth about 9/11.


Let's resurrect this old comment from Blammo:

Blammo said...

I'll only mention this because it is related to AP's post about cognitive infiltration. Lawson's videos are excellent, but as I recall, his position on 9/11 is that without a 'smoking gun' we cannot say that Israel did it, or was involved, and that said smoking gun does not exist. I can imagine his motives for this are not necessarily sinister, but I cannot say for certain either way. There are lines people are mentally unprepared to cross for whatever reason.

What if the smoking gun does exist and has been found? We suppose that would Change Everything, and important people could get on with the exceedingly important work of holding the perpetrators accountable.

Or would they? Maybe, if they were compromised, they would fail to notice the smoking gun. Maybe things would just get really weird.

The truth about 9/11 is stunningly clear.

The smoking gun does exist.

You can also read about it here, at Don Fox's blog.

From 911U

Having first recognized the vast energy surplus accompanying the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11, and having then connected the dots on the evidence that points to widespread molecular dissociation at ""Ground Zero"", we now consider the possibility of the simplest and thus most likely potential source of the form of energy capable of accomplishing that feat: fissionless fusion energy, released from multiple very-low-yield thermonuclear devices.

Read the rest of APea's fine post at Twelfth Bough - the reality-of-fakery last ditch effort

Nullifying The NSA

James Corbett has put together an extremely good show for his latest "Corbett Report". It's the best news I've heard in a long time.

He interviews people who are advancing the tactic or process of "nullification". What is nullification, you ask? I'll let James Corbett explain it-


James provides links to guests on his show and to websites he mentions at his website-

One of the segments in the report features Tom Woods from a video he has put up in youtube. It is well worth watching in full.


For more information, visit OffNow.Org

Seymour The Janitor

This post is perhaps best seen as an adjunct to WP's revealing article, Big Surprise: US Intel Knew Syrian Rebels Could Produce Sarin; Obama Lied About It Trying To Justify Another War

In writing his article, “Whose Sarin?”, Seymour Hersh is explaining to his audience what happened (and what didn't happen) in Syria and why Obama behaved as he did. He also provides us with the titilating revelation of the National Reconnaissance Office having sensors in Syria that can supposedly detect chemical weapon (CW) activity.

But the first question we need to ask ourselves is “Who is Hersh's audience?”

Syndicate content