Winter Patriot Community Blog

I've just posted a short essay on my main blog.

It's about race, religion, and politics, so it's called "Freedom, Expression, and Danger."

It starts out this way:

In a free country, certain choices are available to all people -- theoretically, at least. In practice, various pressures do limit the choices of many individuals. But the essence of a free country lies in the fact that certain options are legally open to everyone.

and of course it gets worse as it goes along.

You can read the rest here.

Comments for this item are now closed.

As expected, 2016's "commemoration" of 9/11 included a barrage of failed propaganda from various accessories after the fact, all desperately trying to prop up their favorite indefensible fiction.

I've started a series on my main blog, celebrating six of the most pathetic propaganda fails of the weekend.

The table of contents:
Accessories After The Fact Go Splat!! Six Pathetic 9/11 Coverup Fails of 2016

Links to individual posts:

For writing as if the official story were obviously true, for readers who know better, and getting called on it, repeatedly:
Pathetic Fail #6: Robert Bridge and RT

For claiming to "disprove" all the major conspiracy theories, but proving nothing except how weak the official story really is:
Pathetic Fail #5: Jack Holmes and Esquire

For trying to explain the longevity of the 9/11 Truth Movement without even considering the possibility that the official story might be false, while describing evidence indicating that it cannot be true:
Pathetic Fail #4: Matt Kwong and the CBC

For trying to prevent an independent researcher from speaking in a public space:
Pathetic Fail #3: Sam Kestenbaum, Naomi Dann, and the Forward

For telling the world how and why Facebook misled its users about 9/11:
Pathetic Fail #2: Abby Ohlheiser, the Washington Post, and Facebook

It wasn't all pathetic:
Interlude: Three Encouraging Successes

There's more to come, and I will link to future posts as they come online.

Comments for this item are now closed.

For the first time in over two years, there's a new post at my main blog.

Here's an excerpt:

(1) The official story of 9/11 has been used to justify drastic military actions by the United States and its allies, actions which have brought death, destruction, and chaos to Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Libya, Syria, Pakistan, and many other countries.

(2) The same story has also been used to justify drastic changes in domestic policy, in the United States and in much of the world. These changes have resulted in the persecution, incarceration, torture, and death of many innocent people, not to mention the erosion of civil rights and the perversion of the democratic process in every nation that once enjoyed such things.

(3) If it were widely and clearly understood that the official story of 9/11 is not only obviously false but a carefully crafted fiction, the military actions described above would be seen as unjustified acts of mass murder, war crimes and crimes against humanity; the policy changes would be seen as acts of treason; the people responsible for these actions might be in danger of accountability; and the new policies themselves might even be in danger of reversal, in which case the people who benefit from these policies might need to find a new way to feed at the public trough.

(4) If the official story were true, the facts of 9/11 would support it, and independent research would confirm it. Therefore the facts would be widely publicized and independent researchers would be encouraged. But none of this is happening, and that's because the facts of 9/11 undermine the official story, and the independent researchers destroy it.

(5) Therefore the facts and the independent researchers must both be suppressed. Otherwise the new policies would be in danger, the people who implemented them would be in danger, the people who profit from them would be slightly inconvenienced, and the perpetrators of 9/11 might actually be brought to justice.

You can read the rest here.

Comments for this item are now closed.

What the doctor ordered -

View on YouTube
Mouna Bowa

Jean Luc Ponty - Electric Violin
William Lecompte - Keyboards
Guy Nsangué Akwa - Bass
Thierry Arpino - Drums
Moustapha Cissé - Percussion

View on YouTube
Caracas

Updated with a better video at foot of the article

View on YouTube

The video above is an episode of UK Column News 19-8-16. This news service is highly recommended. This particular episode gives prominence to the case of Janice and Brian Docherty (beginning at the 36min mark) whose children have been taken by state authorities because the Docherty's reported the approach of a man wishing to buy access to their autistic son for the sum of 25,000 Pounds. They and their children have been the recipients of extraordinary abuses of power from various government agencies in three jurisdictions. It's a compelling story which demonstrates the existence of a very corrupt network of public employees.

The corrupt personnel include -
the police in Scotland,
the police in Ireland
the police in Northern Ireland
a police ombudsman
Social Services in Scotland and Ireland
judges
lawyers (including their own)
Family Court
a municipal councilor
Irish PM's media staff
journalists
psychologists
social workers
doctors
psychiatrists
mental health nurse
mental health hospital administration staff
Irish and English computer hackers (most likely intel agencies - ed)
an aristocrat
the Catholic Church hierarchy
Freemasons
and political thugs such as the IRA

Quite a list of characters, I'm sure you'll agree. These people are from Ireland, Northern Ireland and Scotland. They were all connected and co-ordinated. What sort of organisation could band them together? One that exists below the radar, at least, but one that wields a very destructive power. The fact that this network can act with impunity implies that the whole civil administrative structure of these countries is corrupt to the point of enabling the worst kind of child exploitation.

To understand if any state is involved in a criminal act or acts, ask the question, "What should have happened and didn't?"

Below is a link to the pdf which features in the video above. It documents every statement made in the video -
http://www.ukcolumn.org/sites/default/files/documents/Docherty.pdf

Here is a link to 5hrs of interviews with Janice and Brian Docherty-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jat6wPf_KSM

The ten interviews can be listened to individually here-

UK Column Homepage

UKC 19-8-16 News Edition
(The Docherty case begins at the 36min mark)

London Metropolitan policeman describing the epidemic of child sexual abuse and exploitation by the powerful in political circles. Again, the generally hidden network of corrupt officials is evident

And for those not living in the United Kingdom, do not think it is any different in your country.

UPDATE

The good folks at UK Column have edited their 19th Aug news show to just feature the Dockerty case. It is 19mins long and can be seen here together with other information
http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/docherty-case-ten-questions

Or watch below-

View on YouTube

The title refers to the many people connected to the Clintons that have suddenly and conveniently died. Recently there was another spate of deaths surrounding Hillary culminating in the death of Seth Rich. There are so many deaths that coincidence or random chance cannot account for them. All that is left as an explanation is what they look like – assassinations of people who went against the financial and political interests of Bill and/or Hillary Clinton 'by persons unknown'.

View on YouTube

It is admittedly premature but it seems to me that Hillary may well be in line to fall to that same sword of power. Hillary is extremely unpopular with her own party's followers.

She is very obviously in poor physical health and her mental health is in question, too. That she is the Democratic candidate seems like a massive head-scratching contradiction. All this effort just to get her through another day. But then, maybe that is all these handlers need to do!

Photo published by Reuters Feb 2016