Home › Blogs › Winter's blog

Accessories After The Fact Go Splat!! Six Pathetic 9/11 Coverup Fails of 2016

Mon, 09/12/2016 - 11:54 — Winter

As expected, 2016's "commemoration" of 9/11 included a barrage of failed propaganda from various accessories after the fact, all desperately trying to prop up their favorite indefensible fiction.

I've started a series on my main blog, celebrating six of the most pathetic propaganda fails of the weekend.

The table of contents:
Accessories After The Fact Go Splat!! Six Pathetic 9/11 Coverup Fails of 2016

Links to individual posts:

For writing as if the official story were obviously true, for readers who know better, and getting called on it, repeatedly:
Pathetic Fail #6: Robert Bridge and RT

For claiming to "disprove" all the major conspiracy theories, but proving nothing except how weak the official story really is:
Pathetic Fail #5: Jack Holmes and Esquire

For trying to explain the longevity of the 9/11 Truth Movement without even considering the possibility that the official story might be false, while describing evidence indicating that it cannot be true:
Pathetic Fail #4: Matt Kwong and the CBC

For trying to prevent an independent researcher from speaking in a public space:
Pathetic Fail #3: Sam Kestenbaum, Naomi Dann, and the Forward

For telling the world how and why Facebook misled its users about 9/11:
Pathetic Fail #2: Abby Ohlheiser, the Washington Post, and Facebook

It wasn't all pathetic:
Interlude: Three Encouraging Successes

There's more to come, and I will link to future posts as they come online.

Comments for this item are now closed.

Comments

Wed, 09/14/2016 - 09:19 — Greg Bacon (not verified)

Tall Tales of 9/11

One of my favorite LIES about 9/11 concerns Flight 93, that crashed or as Rummy said, was shot down near Shanksville, PA. Don't know if they're still pushing the original LIE, but that one said that the reason there was hardly any debris or bodies from a 100 ton jet is because the ground liquefied and swallowed up the jet.

A whopper doesn't get much better or bigger than that one!

As for the Pentagon, the notion that a Boeing 757, mostly made from aluminum, could crash thru over NINE FEET of heavily reinforced concrete is absurd.

Passenger jets have been forced to make an emergency landing after hitting a flock of birds that damage the wings and nose, but we're supposed to believe that it had the strength to crash thru over NINE FEET of heavily reinforced concrete?

Only believable to those who still believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.

Thu, 09/15/2016 - 05:27 — Greg Bacon (not verified)

The JFK Conspiracy Says the US House

If Kwong thinks there is no JFK conspiracy, he needs to do his research a little deeper:

The House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded that "scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy." It added that "on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.

http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKassassinationsC.htm

Maybe Kwong needs to ask himself why the Bush-Cheney Junta went to war against Afghanistan even though they offered to turn over Bin Laden, on a couple of conditions: That the White Paper that Colin Powell had promised, the one that showed Bin Laden Inc had done 9/11, be released and that both nations agree on a neutral 3rd nation for BL's trial, so he'd get a FAIR trial. Imagine that, some so-called backward nation like Afghanistan insisting to the USA on a fair trail.

Bush instead gave Afghanistan unrelenting Hell, that continues to this day.

But hey, someone has to protect those poppy fields!

Thu, 09/15/2016 - 07:53 — Winter

"probably"!

Good point, Greg!

The official US government position since 1978 has been that JFK was "probably" killed as a result of a conspiracy, and therefore that the JFK conspiracy "theorists" are probably right.

The word "probably" is their last gasp. It is intended to leave open the possibility that JFK was killed by multiple shooters firing at him at the same time, by coincidence. It's a ludicrous notion but it's all that stands in the way of the House Committee declaring that JFK WAS killed as a result of a conspiracy, which is clearly true even though they won't admit it.

In any case, despite the fact that the official position was changed in 1978, based on evidence not available to the Warren Commission, mainstream media personalities CONTINUE to claim that "no one has ever brought forward new evidence challenging the conclusions of the Warren Commission." And this is only one of the many lies they continue to tell about JFK and about the people who don't believe the Warren Commission.

The post was probably too long already, so I didn't say this there. But we can say it here as many times as we like.

Thanks again, Greg. I appreciate your comments here.

Fri, 09/16/2016 - 05:41 — Anonymous (not verified)

thanks for your efforts to

thanks for your efforts to keep this alive! your research and time invested is much appreciated and certainly must be exhausting for you.

Fri, 09/16/2016 - 15:32 — Winter

Thanks very much

I appreciate your very thoughtful comment. I don't think my work is very well-appreciated by the people I've been writing about, but that's fine by me. And if you appreciate it, that's even better.

Yes, it's a lot of work, but the exhausting part is absorbing the propaganda barrage, working out what it all means and whether any of it could actually be true, and trying not to take it all personally.

Writing about it is more invigorating than anything else; sometimes I think I write about it so I won't have to think about it anymore.

In any event, I am still working on the rest of the series and will post the next pieces as soon as I can.

Thanks again and best wishes
WP

Mon, 09/19/2016 - 15:21 — Greg Bacon (not verified)

So Many Questions, So Little Time

Wonder what Abby thinks of the 'missing' gold and silver bullion that had mysteriously disappeared from the basement of WTC 4 the NIGHT BEFORE the 9/11 attack?

Was Benjamin Laden so crafty his band of Muzzie terrorists were able to sneak into a heavily guarded WTC vault and steal several hundred billion in gold and silver bullion the NIGHT BEFORE the 9/11 attack?

Guess they tired of showing up at tittie bars, snorting cocaine, drinking copious amounts of booze, issuing threats and leaving their Koran at the bar!

http://americanfreepress.net/how-much-gold-was-under-wtc-complex/

Or maybe she can explain the mysterious explosion at WTC 6 that sent building fragments over 500 feet into the air?

Before the smoke had cleared from around the stricken South Tower, a mysterious explosion shot 550 feet into the air above the U.S. Customs House at 6 World Trade Center. This unexplained blast at the Customs House has never been investigated or reported in the mainstream media.

http://whale.to/a/bollyn02july10.html

Exposing what did happen on 9/11 is good and is growing, but there is a BIG downside. The real perps who did 9/11 are so sick and twisted, that they'd set off WW III rather than face justice.
And they way things are playing out in the ME, that might be what happens.

But we must not give up or give in. If you don't want the truth for yourself, then fight for your children's right to grow up as free people and not slaves.