The Brexit vote has taken up many columns of print and lots of space on online news services and on YouTube. Most pundits and commenters (including this writer) were caught off guard by the declared result of the vote to “Leave” the EU. In hindsight though, maybe we shouldn't have been when we consider the broader context in which the referendum was staged.
To start with, it is well to remember that it was none other than David Cameron that called the referendum. That is odd. Why would he (meaning his handlers) call for a vote on something that he apparently has nothing to gain from but something significant to lose? Psychopaths are not known for their commitment to democracy or the public welfare. They are instead known widely for their commitment to furthering their own power and that of their handlers. So, immediately, we can say there is something wrong with this Brexit picture.
Many commenters have pointed out that the vote is only 'advisory' as far as the parliament is concerned. In other words, the government is not obliged to do anything regarding the result of the referendum. It can simply ignore the result. So some say “call-me-Dave” Cameron was not risking anything at all. True. Or almost true, anyway. British voters who want to leave have no doubts now that they are in the majority and this will, by itself, make things difficult for the government, their handlers and other beneficiaries of the present bureaucratic and fascist nightmare that is the EU.
On the topic of majorities, we had yet another close vote, 52-48%, which had the benefit of turning the vote into a media drama like all the other “close fought” voting events around the world in recent years. Many point to the technology that is available now to rig the voting to produce these sporting-like media sensations as the reason. I agree because I am convinced that if this technology is available to the psychopaths in charge that they will use it. They cannot act contrary to their natures and psychopathic nature compels these people to steal anything and everything they can. So the vote was almost certainly rigged.
But if it was rigged, why was the vote tipped in favour of the “Leave” side? Perhaps “tipped” isn't the right word. For starters, perhaps the majority was minimised from something far higher than 52%. A large majority of people in London voted to “Remain” but this is not surprising given that the majority of Londoners now are from foreign backgrounds and a large proportion of the remaining ethnic Britons are from the 'chardonnay class' or otherwise less kindly known as the 'chattering class'. So that particular result in London is quite understandable.
But I have read many people making the comment that outside of London they personally do not know anyone who supports the “Remain” side. These people are either involved in the productive economy or have been excluded from the productive economy, such that it is, after the EU bureaucracy has had its devastating way with it and winning absolutely no friends in the process. It should have been more of a rout outside of London. But if the vote was knocked down from say 72-62% to 52%, why not 49%?
Well, if the Powers That Be have tight control over the result (and that is almost a given), then it follows that they wanted a narrow win for the “Leave” side. But why? Let's first look at the wider context of world politics and where the Russian connection comes in.
We know that the Western bankers need to institute a new Cold War with Russia to stop trade between the EU countries and Russia and preferably China, too. With China and Russia dropping the use of the US dollar in international trade, the bankers are at severe risk that much of the rest of the world following suit. The bankers' power is dependent on them issuing US dollars and the rest of the world using them to trade with. The only way to preserve a 'market' for the US$ is to 'capture' Europe and isolate Russia and China. To ensure this, the bankers need to absolutely control Europe through the EU.
The bankers also need to stop the gas flow from Russia to the EU countries and to do this they need the EU in place and stopping countries such as Bulgaria and Greece from allowing gas pipelines (which would be very beneficial to their domestic economies) from traversing their territory. The problem for the bankers, though, is the fast rising opposition to the EU from most of the populations of its member countries. As the EU tightens its control over these countries, the people have suffered shrinking economies and growing immigration and the troubles that attend both of these outcomes. People are increasingly, and rightly, seeing their economic and social problems as a direct result of EU membership. The pressure to leave is growing and the bankers dream of complete world domination is fading accordingly. What to do?
The following is speculation but I think it is a reasonable projection given the past behaviour of the psychopathic PTB, the bankers. I believe what our rapacious bankers wish to do to Britain is, in the words of Henry Kissinger to Pakistan's Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, to “make a horrible example of you”.
The British economy will be crashed. It has already started with the sinking of the British Pound as per George Soros' threat. And if you think the Forex markets are really markets, then I have a bridge to sell you. The bankers can collectively crash the market anytime they choose by way of a quaint practice called 'short selling'. 'Short selling' means selling currency or stocks you don't have. In any market other than a financial one, this is called fraud.
The EU will make as much mischief for Britain as it can. Cameron, who has announced his forthcoming resignation, while still maintaining control, will assist the process in any way he can. All the while, he will maintain that he is not to blame because he warned the British public about leaving the EU. "It's your fault", in other words. A new Prime Minister would face pressure to improve matters so Cameron will stay on and be rewarded appropriately after eventually leaving office and devastating the country.
A new conservative party leader will be elected and appointed PM and will announce a general election and will effectively turn it into a new referendum on EU membership. The Conservative govt will be returned and the pressure on the economy will be eased by the bankers. This will be paraded as proof positive that remaining in the EU is the only possibility if a country wishes to have any sort of economy at all.
The other countries in the EU who wish to “leave” will have this “lesson” beaten over their populations' heads day and night to the tune of TINA (There Is No Alternative) until all resistance to the EU and their banker masters has been rendered impotent.
If this is the bankers' plan then it has to be seen as high risk if the general public realises that they are being deliberately economically punished for the "Leave" vote. But the bankers are in dire straits and desperate times call for desperate measures.
The following Crosstalk show addresses some good points regarding Brexit and is notable for three things : the insightful comments from Patrick Henningsen, no neocohn jerks and Peter Lavelle doesn't talk and interrupt quite as much as usual.
Below are two videos. The first is from Monty Python lampooning reality.
The second is from the European Parliament lampooning Europeans.
John Cleese is reported to have said a couple of years ago that Monty Python could not be done again today because reality has overtaken their art of ridicule. Or something to that effect!
After the banking corruption at the heart of the housing meltdown in the US in 2007 and the subsequent bank bail-outs that defied all reason in 2008/9, the following Monty Python sketch seems quaint
And now for a truly mind-numbing display of what democracy, as proscribed by bankers, means in the EU Parliament to which not even Monty Python could hold a candle to (H/T to Greencrow)
The other day I came across an article that was published last month after the Brussels terror attack. The original was published in Russian on the Komsomolskay Pravda site. Below is the translated version featured on the Russia Insider site.
At first, the article appeared to me to be unremarkable enough then I saw two glaring problems that the article pointed to. Or, rather, the same problem manifesting in two different ways. It was unremarkable to begin with because of its familiarity. I seem to read articles like this every day. The problem is that of uncritical thinking; the inability to identify what is in front of one's nose. It is not limited to Russian citizens, either. It is wide-spread throughout the Western world.
Indeed, if people everywhere could think critically and were able to identify the reality that is in front of them all day, every day, then we would not find ourselves reading about wars from Africa to the Middle East to the Caucasus.
Below is the article in question and I have highlighted the statements that stood out for me and which I will write about at the foot of the article.
|On the Day of the Brussels Bombing - as Maria Zakharova Saw It:|
Foreign Ministry spokeswoman shares her frustration with western coverage of terrorism
Translated by Julia Rakhmetova and Rhod Mackenzie
This day, 22 March, should have been different, not the one we all had. There should have been meetings, documents – a calm day, with time to get ready for a big ‘week of negotiations’.
We received the first news of the terror attacks in Belgium at 10 a.m.. An hour and a half later we became aware of the scale of the tragedy. Telephones “exploded”.
“Are there any Russians involved in the Brussels tragedy?”
“How does Foreign Ministry evaluate what is happening in Brussels?”
“Is there any plan to counteract the terrorist threat in Europe?”
There were dozens of questions. I must have given ten interviews: Russia-24, Channel One, Dozhd, Ren-TV, Life-news, RSN, agencies, newspapers, online media… I don’t remember them all.
Someone asked: “Why did you work so hard? It wasn’t us who suffered from the explosions!”
“I mean how long are you going to sympathize with ‘them’ since they don’t care about ‘us’ when we have terror attacks in our country. Usually they just make fun of us…Aren’t you fed up with that?”
I was shocked, and started to say publicly and with increasing emphasis: “We extend our sincere condolences… Words of encouragement to those…It’s our common tragedy… We need to join forces… It’s important to understand the root causes…” (indeed, ed)
Of course, it’s my job to answer questions from the media. But that’s not the point. It was hard for me to accept that people were beginning to sidestep the issue, but also, tired of the world ignoring our Russian tragedies and catastrophes. Waiting for my turn on air, I read various comments, some desperate: “They never sympathize with ‘US’, so why should we sympathize with ‘THEM”.
The below video (in four parts) lays out the psychopathic program(me) to dominate the minds of the ordinary people through public education. That this is designed to take away peoples ability to think critically and their free will is bad enough, but when it is clear that the goal of it all is the waging of modern warfare, it can be seen as truly diabolical.
Who would have thought that accepting compulsory state education for our children would lead directly to the murder of countless millions of people? Such are the outcomes when we suffer psychopaths in 'authority' and do not widely promote the skills of critical thinking and the ability to understand and identify psychopathy.
Mark Passio is interviewed by Richard Grove from Tragedy and Hope on The Psychology of Control. It is an outstanding interview. One topic builds upon another but given that it is an interview and not a presentation, the topics aren't always in the most easily absorbable order to take it in as a whole. Below is my summary of the interview which places the topics in an order that best suits me and hopefully will be of benefit to you, the reader, and allow you to get the most out of this excellent interview.
Mark Passio says some things at times that I don't agree with but it is hard to find anything in this particular interview to quibble with. To the interview-
This world is set up to mirror back to us our behaviour so that we might learn as we go. The 'set up' is described as Natural Law. “Law”, in this sense, is something that is universally binding on all and is immutable; that is, it is unchanging. So the “Law” applies to all people and circumstances throughout all time and there are no exceptions – gravity is a common everyday example of this.
We have free will to follow the dictates of Natural Law or not. Either way, consequences will follow over which we have no control but we do know they are constant and unchanging. In that, the consequences, Natural Law, gives us feedback and allows us to learn.
The Law of Consequences covers the deterministic portion of existence and the Law of 'Do no harm' covers the free will aspect. If we act so as to do no harm to others, we can expect a life of order and peace. If we transgress this injunction, we can expect to have a world of chaos just as we can experience around us every day. The state of the world leads us to the inescapable conclusion is that we, as a species, are transgressing Natural Law in some major ways.
And, indeed, we are. Leading us in this journey into chaos are the psychopaths amongst us who are intent on exploitation and destruction.
The world today is the result of our behaviour.
Our behaviour is the result of our decision making processes.
Our decision making processes are dependent on our thought processes and the quality and quantity or information available to us.
So if the psychopaths can influence our thinking and the information that is available to us, they can control our behaviour and therefore the state of the world. And they do. They do this through religion, through schooling and through the media. The psychopaths' power comes from withholding information and corrupting what information that we do get.
We are taught a “stimulus/response” model. This model completely leaves out the logical thinking that should be in between stimulus and response. This omission takes away our personal control and we become a nation of 'order followers'.
Following orders seems to remove personal responsibility but it never does. We are treated as children in a dysfunctional family and we never grow up. Just as children in a dysfunctional family, we accept that we are powerless and learn to make the best of it. Children are indeed powerless but as adults we are not. Learning to question what we are taught and to think for ourselves together with taking full responsibility for our behaviour is the way to adulthood, order and a measure of peace. To the extent that we endeavour to do no harm to others, we experience freedom.
We become order followers because we accept the notion of authority over us by others (usually the psychopaths). This authority over others does not exist in reality, in Natural Law. And to believe in something that does not exist is a sign of mental illness or delusion. Harm to all will result. So it can be seen that those that would rule us are mentally ill and the last people that should be 'driving the bus'!
Violence is used to enforce this delusional authority and this results in more harm as violence is also against Natural Law. Natural Law embodies the law of self defence whereby one is entitled to ward off violence by using force of one's own. Force is self defence so long as it is needed to protect oneself. If more force than this is used, then it becomes violence itself. To subdue an attacker is self defence. To then proceed to maim or kill the attacker becomes violence as it is not necessary to protect oneself.
The Law of Self Defence is the Masculine Principle. The Law of Non-aggression is the Feminine Principle and they work together to make up the whole of the Law as it applies to human relationships. Natural Law is objective, that is, it can be observed in objective reality and is not determined by opinions which are subjective. Natural Law can be seen as a science.
Society's laws (governments and legal societies) are very subjective and arbitrary and serve one section of the society (the psychopathic rulers) at the expense of everyone else. Being out of sympathy with Natural Law (which ensures order) this man-made law will inevitably bring chaos. And it does. This chaos can be further exploited by the psychopaths so long as they can keep its origin hidden from us. This is best done through fear. Chaos engenders confusion and therefore fear for us. Further increasing fear for us through terror attacks and stress through tough economic conditions makes sure we stay disoriented.
Promoting Solipsism also leads to fear because its reasoning inevitably leads to the conclusion that we know nothing and there is no order to the world. Solipsism teaches that we are the centre of our universe and that all we can know is our own perceptions but not what our perceptions are based on. It is an egoic madness.
The madness, the chaos, the harm that is all around us is the result of transgressing Natural Law. The answer is to learn Natural Law and apply it in our daily lives. We can learn it for ourselves by learning critical thinking i.e. The Trivium and by responding with compassion towards our fellow man. Our 'fellow man' does not include the psychopaths and we would do well to learn to identify them, as well.
So there we are! I hope this proves to be a useful, albeit skeletal, framework to follow and absorb the wisdom from both Mark Passio and Richard Grove.
I found the cartoon below on Signs of the Times website. The author of the cartoon is not noted at SOTT or on the cartoon itself. Which is a pity because it is an excellent depiction of what is really going on with all these 'terrorist attacks'.
"You were supposed to attack civilians, women, children, innocent people from outside the political arena. For one simple reason: to force the public to turn to the State, turn to the regime, and ask for greater security. This was precisely the role of the Right in Italy. It placed itself at the service of the State under an aptly termed 'Strategy of Tension'. They had to get ordinary people to accept that at any moment over a period of 30 years, from 1960 to the mid-80s, a state of emergency could be declared. So, people would willingly trade part of their freedom for the security of being able to walk the streets, go on trains or enter a bank. This is the political logic behind all the bombings. They remain unpunished because the State cannot condemn itself."
~ Italian neo-fascist whose prosecution led to the discovery of NATO's 'Gladio' networks across Western Europe
- Vincenzo Vinciguerra
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Psychopaths (the 5%) cause 95% of all the trouble on earth and 100% of the wars. If we see that wars are perpetrated by psychopaths and ordinary people are always the victims, we can see that the history of civilisation has been one long war by the psychopaths (governments and those that control them) against ordinary human beings. Know your enemy.
Marcus Papadopoulos explains how the Western governments (psychopaths) have been the ultimate cause behind the Brussels attack on innocent people-