The children seen in the videos supposedly showing chemical attack victims in East Ghouta (Damascus), were kidnapped from the Latakia province (which is over two hundred kilometres away) two weeks previously by the paid jihadists of Saudi Arabia.
Reports on this have been circulating around the internet for sometime including those from Voltairenet and Russia Today (listen carefully from 2:55 onwards) claiming the child victims had been kidnapped previously as seen above. But no one has provided a source for the story. We have refrained from publishing anything about it here at Winter Patriot Community until we could establish a source for this information. We now have that elusive source. Below are two quotes from a report of a Carmelite nun, Mother Agnes Mariam de la croix (some details of her here) . We believe this report has been furnished to the UN and was originally written in French. The translation accounts for some of the unusual phrasing.
From the Introduction of the report - (emphasis added except for the last four words of the second quote which are in the original)
|"We found that as a whole, the videos present a clear absence of normal Syrian family life, with no signs of the presence of the resident civilian population. While the proliferation of young males and children everywhere, dead or alive, let us wonder who they are and what they are doing in East Ghouta without their families. |
Our first concern was the fate of the children we see in the footages. Those angels are always alone in the hands of adult young males that seem to be elements of armed gangs. The children they trespassed remained without their families and unidentified all the way until they are wrapped in the white shrouds of the burial. Moreover, our study highlight without any doubt their little bodies were manipulated and disposed with theatrical arrangements to figure in the screening.
Thus we accuse the editors of the videos of artificial scenic treatment of what should have been honest information footage. The cynic manipulation of the little inanimate bodies, that seem to be under anaesthesia, endangered the life of the children and raises in our minds the question of their safety and the real reason of their death. . . . . "
From the Conclusion of this same report-
|"Studying the videotaped documentations available on line, from the point of view of the structure of the Syrian society, we find that the civilian population in East Ghouta as presented in those videos is inconsistent with the composition of a real Syrian civilian society. There is a flagrant lack of real Syrian families in East Ghouta, as presented by the videos. So with the terrible sense of the existence of a horrible crime we ask: Who are the children who are exposed in those videos? |
From where do they come? Where are their parents? How did they get killed? Where are their corpses buried?
We think that with the evidences of media manipulation that are shown in this Study, and other studies, there is a moral obligation to launch an International investigation and arrest Warrant under the yellow and black notice to find and identify the Syrian children bodies used in a criminal way in the so called Chemical Attacks of East Ghouta .
On the other hand, we are in close contact with the survivors of the horrendous massacres perpetrated on the 4th of August 2013 by Jobhat El Nosra and allies in eleven villages from Lattakiah mountains. As Reconciliation Committee we are trying to liberate more than 150 women and children, abducted under the pretext to exchange them for detainees. We have been contacted by the families of some abducted women and children. They recognise their relatives in the videos published online that show the alleged victims of the Chemical Attack in East Ghouta.
Some families have filed a complaint to the Syrian authorities in Syria. They need to be heard on an international level. We need to help raise International Awareness toward the humanitarian case of the criminal use of children in the East Ghouta Chemical Attack. Will you join us?"
This is the best source we can have. Mother Agnes, mother superior of the monastery of James the Mutilated in Qara (Syria), is a highly credible source and she is citing family members who are known to her who have made positive identifications.
What does this all mean?
(click on "read more" to continue)
First of all, some of the children in the videos have been identified as coming from Latakia region. We know the kidnapped children are in the hands of the jihadists. They made a video of the captured women and children to prove it. Therefore the young men of military age seen in the videos 'attending' the children are either jihadists or supporting them (same thing). They are obviously lying when they say that the children are from Ghouta. Apart from them being from Latakia, East Ghouta, the site of the attacks has been largely depopulated after months of fighting there. Children would have been the first to be evacuated. There would not have been large numbers of children living in East Ghouta. They must have been brought in from elsewhere by the terrorists. This also explains the absence of the children's parents, if we needed another explanation.
The paid jihadists are also lying when they say these children are the subjects of Sarin gas poisoning. If they were, then they would not be displaying the heavily tranquillised behaviour we see in some of the videos. We would be seeing yellow foaming from their mouths and they would be dead. And so would the people handling them. These jihadists have no more protection than cotton masks which would be insufficient to protect them from sarin poisoning and death themselves.
We now know, courtesy of the just released UN report into the Ghouta chemical attack, that the attack involved sarin gas. Therefore these videos were not part of, or a result of, that sarin gas attack at East Ghouta. They were made quite separately from the sarin gas attack. The videos were uploaded to youtube immediately after the chemical attack showing that they were made in advance with prior knowledge of the Sarin attack to come. Mother Agnes points out in her report how it would have been impossible to arrange the children and make the videos in the time available, in any case.
If the paid jihadists of the governments of Saudi Arabia and NATO members knew of the chemical attack in advance, it is inescapable that they were a party to it if not the principal perpetrators.
So, where did these perpetrators get the sarin gas (or the ingredients) and the knowledge of how to use them? Govts who research, make and store chemical weapons are the ones with the expertise. The only governments that would provide this material and expertise are the governments that are financially and logistically supporting the terrorists. Saudi Arabia, israel, US, Britain, France or perhaps even Turkey. Take your pick!
Indeed there is a video on youtube of a father complaining that his son, a jihadist, died from an explosion of a chemical weapon provided by Saudi Arabia. He blamed the Saudis because they just left the canisters with the jihadists without explaining how they should be handled.
(Skip the first minute if cannot stand watching Kerry lying. For the time pressed see particularly from 4:00 onwards)
The jihadist terrorists are totally dependent (apart from what they can steal) on NATO and Friends (such as Saudi Arabia) for everything from money to ammunition and weapons to logistics and intelligence (sic). They cannot cook up and carry out an operation like the gassing at East Ghouta without the approval, support and direction of NATO or more specifically, the US.
Looked at from another angle, given that the Saudis supplied these chemical weapons to the jihadists in East Ghouta, it is reasonable to believe that the CIA would know about it. They would have had to have known because this is actually their war. This is what they do and why they exist. This is what they did in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Saudi Arabia is also entirely dependent on US militarily and financially. And, after all, the entire purpose of the chemical attack and the pre-made videos was to provide the excuse for the military intervention of the US.
The children portrayed in the jihadist's pre-made videos were in fact prisoners from another province and were not killed by Sarin gas (though it is inescapable that they were killed while in the custody of the jihadists i.e. the children were killed by the jihadists). The US would know this is a false portrayal because it is an integral and vital part of the operation to provide the cassus belli for bombing Syria. The Saudis are not going to go to all this trouble to provide the excuse the US needs unless it has been prearranged and the US knowledge and approval. This is because to justify the risk, it has to be preordained that the US will follow through. And they did propaganda-wise and very quickly at that.
It is axiomatic that immediately after a terrorist attack, if the 'culprits' and methods are announced by a govt or state body before there could be any reasonable investigation, then these finger-pointing governments are, in fact, the perpetrators.
Another reason the CIA would know the truth of what happened at East Ghouta and what happened to the children is based on their own reports. Because they have built their case for war on youtube videos which contain so many contradictions and anomalies that the CIA cannot be credible in any way and point directly to them hiding the truth. If they are deliberately hiding the truth, then they must know the truth.
Mother Agnes's report takes 13 of these same videos and takes them apart using observation and logic. There is no way the CIA can plead ignorance of these multiple problems. Its their job, after all, their raison d'etre, not to be fooled by fakery. With all the CIA's resources, training and skills, it becomes impossible for them to escape the charge of promoting false evidence as a case for war.
It then becomes obvious that the CIA has another agenda. They have been party to cold-bloodedly abducting and killing children (while filming this atrocity!) for the sole purpose of destroying Syria just as they have destroyed, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. You can't repeat the same thing over and over while wringing your hands over the appalling consequences and not change your behaviour unless the outcome is, in fact, the desired outcome. "By their deeds you shall know them"
It becomes inescapable then that the outcome the US and its controller, israel, want is the complete destruction of these countries and the destruction of others such as Iran, whom they never tire of threatening.
So, if the CIA knows why wouldn't Obama know? If Obama does not know it can only be through wilful ignorance because the reasoning he is using together with the recent history of all the armed interventions in the Middle East does not make any sense at all. It is the same type of looney reasoning that has destroyed country after country. And now Obama wants to bomb Syria and, unavoidably, kill more innocent women and children in the process to 'punish' Assad because he says Assad killed innocent women and children?!? No, that is not the reasoning of a sane human being. That's the reasoning of a psychopath.
And of course, it only gets worse if he does know the details of this truly diabolical operation using the lives of totally innocent little children in such a cynical way. Using them to bring destruction down on the heads of an innocent population who have already suffered so much at the hands of NATO and Friends. That is evil.
This whole exercise, indeed the last two and a half years of violence towards the Syrian people from the start (written in April 2011), displays a complete lack of shame, principles, compassion, guilt or any human feeling at all. We are watching, listening to lying demons intent on destruction.
The report of Mother Agnes Mariam de la Croix is available here in two parts.
They are entitled ISTEAMS-report-Ghouta2a and 2b and well worth reading through. The lies of everybody pushing for war in Syria become very obvious.
The above link has proved problematical at times.
Voltaire net now has a summary of some of the points in Mother Agnes' report and a link to a dropbox to download that report here.
See also -
"Russia says the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) has confirmed that the videos and photos purporting to show the victims of a chemical attack near the Syrian capital, Damascus, were fabricated. "!
Many thanks to McJ for links, info and analysis.