james's blog

Managing and Curing Metabolic Diseases Without Drugs (and a question of values)

Below are some videos that take two differing approaches to curing metabolic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's amongst others. These diseases can be managed successfully, and often cured outright, with what we feed the body both physically and mentally.

Much of this information, particularly relating to the benefits of the ketogenic diet, have been known to medical authorities for decades. Yet this invaluable information has not been transfered to the public at large. This brings in the question of values. What does this witholding of information say about the values of the medical profession?

In the talk by Dr. John Demartini, he explains very carefully how a persons behaviour illustrates their values and that when someone (or group) continues a destructive behaviour, it is always because they perceive they are gaining more than they are losing.

There is much more than this brief introduction in these videos. They are quite profound, in my view. World changing even, at least for some.

(My apologies for the formatting. I can't get the videos in a smaller frame despite the code indicating a much smaller size)

It is worth noting that in this first video, the presenter, Dr. Dominic D'Agostino explains that the medical profession uses the fact that cancer cells are heavily dependent on sugar to diagnose cancer but will not use this information, this weakness of cancer, to treat it.


The clip below includes footage from the film "First Do No Harm" about Charlie Abrahams experience at the hands of five pediatricians.


This lecture by Dr. John Demartini is wide ranging but ties a persons values to their health. He explains the physiological chain connecting these two things.
It is worth reflecting, too, on our sick society and what that says about our values.


Back With a Bang!


APea of Twelfth Bough is back after an extended hiatus with some fresh and enlightening writing. She ties together in in one neat article the demolition of the WTC Towers with subsequent false flag terror events and the continuing psychological warfare perpetrated on all of us that surrounds all this.

the reality-of-fakery last ditch effort

So I had to stop blogging and step back for a variety of reasons. I used the time gained to investigate some other corners of the internet, and some other issues, including 9/11. I had never devoted enough time to 9/11.

There is an opportunity cost to everything we do and pay attention to. Understanding is a process, a journey. We make mistakes, take detours, add data, then modify or firm up opinion as needed. One has to take risks to add value and move the personal and collective understanding closer to the TRUTH, which is the goal.

When a person who is honestly mistaken is confronted by the truth, that person either stops being mistaken or stops being honest. 911 University - College of Disinformation Recognition

The perpetrators of 9/11 have a different goal: to prevent discovery of the truth. They employ an army of minions to this end. They have many ways to encumber people. Sometimes it is obvious, and sometimes it is not. One can suspect but not be sure. It really comes down to seeing patterns over time.

In order to be good at Disinformation Recognition, it is very helpful to be good at Pattern Recognition, and necessary to be able to look at things differently. 911 University - College of Disinformation Recognition

By diverting our attention and wasting our time, they obscure the truth about 9/11.


Let's resurrect this old comment from Blammo:

Blammo said...

I'll only mention this because it is related to AP's post about cognitive infiltration. Lawson's videos are excellent, but as I recall, his position on 9/11 is that without a 'smoking gun' we cannot say that Israel did it, or was involved, and that said smoking gun does not exist. I can imagine his motives for this are not necessarily sinister, but I cannot say for certain either way. There are lines people are mentally unprepared to cross for whatever reason.

What if the smoking gun does exist and has been found? We suppose that would Change Everything, and important people could get on with the exceedingly important work of holding the perpetrators accountable.

Or would they? Maybe, if they were compromised, they would fail to notice the smoking gun. Maybe things would just get really weird.

The truth about 9/11 is stunningly clear.

The smoking gun does exist.

You can also read about it here, at Don Fox's blog.

From 911U

Having first recognized the vast energy surplus accompanying the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11, and having then connected the dots on the evidence that points to widespread molecular dissociation at ""Ground Zero"", we now consider the possibility of the simplest and thus most likely potential source of the form of energy capable of accomplishing that feat: fissionless fusion energy, released from multiple very-low-yield thermonuclear devices.

Read the rest of APea's fine post at Twelfth Bough - the reality-of-fakery last ditch effort

Nullifying The NSA

James Corbett has put together an extremely good show for his latest "Corbett Report". It's the best news I've heard in a long time.

He interviews people who are advancing the tactic or process of "nullification". What is nullification, you ask? I'll let James Corbett explain it-


James provides links to guests on his show and to websites he mentions at his website-

One of the segments in the report features Tom Woods from a video he has put up in youtube. It is well worth watching in full.


For more information, visit OffNow.Org

Seymour The Janitor

This post is perhaps best seen as an adjunct to WP's revealing article, Big Surprise: US Intel Knew Syrian Rebels Could Produce Sarin; Obama Lied About It Trying To Justify Another War

In writing his article, “Whose Sarin?”, Seymour Hersh is explaining to his audience what happened (and what didn't happen) in Syria and why Obama behaved as he did. He also provides us with the titilating revelation of the National Reconnaissance Office having sensors in Syria that can supposedly detect chemical weapon (CW) activity.

But the first question we need to ask ourselves is “Who is Hersh's audience?”

Attack On Iran Imminent

All warfare is based on deception.

Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable;
when using our forces, we must seem inactive;
when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away;
when far away, we must make him believe we are near.

Sun Tzu, The Art of War Ch1

In the video below, recorded in June 2012, we see Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State and James Baker, former Secretary of State, (and the audience) gleeful at the prospect of war with Iran and, of course, the prospect of tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of deaths. We also see Clinton outlining what she maintains the Iranians are thinking.

But psychopaths often attribute their thinking to others along with accusing others of doing exactly what they, the psychopaths, are doing. So, if you know how to listen to them, psychopaths will tell you all you need to know about them. Clinton in true psychopathic form, is ostensibly elaborating on what she says is the reasoning of some of the Iranians when, in fact, she is outlining her (i.e. her government's) thinking.

(Some transcript and video is available at GlobalResearch H/T Bot Tak at Penny's. The transcript of the full interview can be found here [thanks WP] and a video of the full interview can be found here)

When Clinton says she thinks the Iranians will provoke an attack from the US, she is telling us that a false flag attack on the US (or israel) will appear as a provocation to get America to attack them. It's about as screwy as it can get but we are dealing with the sick logic of psychopaths desperate to deceive the US populace into supporting them by turning reality inside out.
“All war is based on deception”
Once the American public at large and, more particularly, American servicemen and women understand what is really going on, the US administration's power will evaporate.

The above State Department sponsored interview was a little over a year ago. We had representatives of the ruling elite in America drooling at the prospect of ever more war and, yet, today we have this same US government setting itself up as the honourable party to negotiations with Iran. They are now mimicking Russia with this conciliatory approach because they see the approval Russia is getting world wide. Meanwhile, Netanyahu is saying the Iranians are liars and deceivers only to be 'proved right' (and Russia and the world 'proved wrong') when an attack is supposedly perpetrated by Iran against the US or israel and triggering a massive and sudden US response. Can this apparent sudden about-face by the US be in any way believable?

This Is What Disinformation Looks Like.

This is what disinformation looks like. Though seemingly critical of israel, the following article never-the-less uses the terminology and memes/concepts/narratives of the zionist/israeli aligned governments. These memes or concepts are designed to deceive people and reinterpret what their own common sense would tell them. Jonathan Cook is assisting the zionist cause in repeating these false concepts or narratives.

Here is Cook's article. I will insert some clarifying comments in italics in his text and summarise at the end.

Israel still angling for attacks on Syria and Iran
18 September 2013
Counterpunch – 18 September 2013

President Barack Obama may have drawn his seemingly regretted “red line” around Syria’s chemical weapons, but it was neither he nor the international community (“international community” - who are they? - is a term that is used to mislead people into thinking that the support for the US and its warring policies is world wide. It is far from it) based that turned the spotlight on their use. That task fell to Israel.

It was an Israeli general who claimed in April that Damascus had used chemical weapons, forcing Obama into an embarrassing demurral on his stated commitment to intervene should that happen.
According to the Israeli media, it was also Israel that provided the intelligence that blamed the Syrian president, Bashar Al Assad, for the latest chemical weapons attack, near Damascus on August 21, triggering the clamour for a US military response.
It is worth remembering that Obama’s supposed “dithering” on the question of military action has only been accentuated by Israel’s “daring” (cowardly) strikes on Syria – at least three since the start of the year. (Israel lost its appetite for these killing raids after losing one of their F-16 fighter aircraft)

Syndicate content