November 2011

admin's picture

via Poor Richard: USA spending more on nukes now than during Cold War

A subject near and dear to me;
USA spending more on nukes now than during Cold War -
Image from scrapetv.com Image from scrapetv.com TAGS: Health, Nuclear, Russia, History, USA, Government Spending, Culture, War

Though it has been decades since the Cold War came to a close, the United States government spends more money on nuclear warheads now than it did during its stand-off with the Soviet Union.

As the US vows to cut down its arsenal of nuclear weapons, the cost the country spends annually on maintaining its supply is much more than America invested each year during the Cold War. Estimates suggest that currently the US puts around $55 billion annually into its nuclear weapons program, reports Mother Jones; by comparison, the cost of the nuke complex for the country during the Cold War ran at an average of only $35 billion each year.

Only three months into his presidency, Barack Obama said in April 2009 that he envisioned an Earth in the future fee of nuclear weapons. Just two years later, however, America’s arsenal of those warheads amounts to roughly 2,500 nukes ready to be deployed.

It was only less than two weeks ago that the United States finally dismantled its largest atomic bomb, the B53, which was said to be 600 times more powerful than the nuke that was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan towards the finale of the Second World War. As that nuke was dismantled, Deputy Secretary of Energy Dan Poneman told NPR that the bomb was a “Cold War relic” and showed the direction of dismantling that the United States was heading towards.

Even if the country is cutting back on its nukes, the United States has a backup stash larger than the active bombs, allowing for the country to in total have 5,113 nuclear warheads in its position. The surplus of not-quite-ready nukes is at 2,600, and though they cannot be deployed at a drop of a hat like the others, they can be reanimated as full-fledged warheads.

Peter Fedewa of the pro-disarmament Ploughshares Fund says that those nukes “could be 'raised from the dead' and brought back into deployment with relative ease."

Under the START treaty that the US signed with Russia last year, both countries vow to soon enough limit their stash of active warheads to only 1,500. The document does not, however, say how many back-up nukes either country can have. In the interim, Mother Jones reports that the Pantex plant near Amarillo, Texas holds around 3,000 warheads that are on the schedule to be dismantled, something America used to do at a pace of around 1,300 per year. Last year, however, both Congress and the White House said that the country would cut back on the cost of dismantling the warheads and instead now invest the money on the upkeep of already dead nukes.

newjesustimes's picture

Occupy Building 7

So it seems the movement is still moving... I received this in my Email today,

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To: NJT
From: [AE911Truth]
Date: November 7, 2011*
Subject: Urgent Action in NY - Occupy Building 7

To all those who continue to fight for the truth about 9/11 to be revealed:

It is time for us to occupy.

• March from Liberty Plaza to WTC 7 at noon each day.
• Occupy the park in front of WTC 7 until nightfall.
• General Assemblies will be held at 2pm each day to discuss the direction
and continuation of the Occupy Building 7 occupation after 11/20. *