From the "Day Late, Dollar Short" category
So his loyalty to the truth propelled him to write a book? Ok.
RIGHT?! That's what I was thinking too! The Scott I knew would NEVER in a MILLION years tell the truth!!
So he had time to have the book "described" to him, but no time to emit a comment? I'd guess the truth is that his comment is not fit for mixed company! LOL, more pressing matters... Like catapulting propaganda with the use of the word "retreat" to describe the only sane option in Iraq? How about instead of commenting on the book, answering to the allegations?
Hey! What happened to your loyalty to the truth, Scottie? -njt |
Just read an interesting story over at Raw; http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Conyers_subpoenas_Karl_Rove_0522.html This particular line caught my eye:
I need to look into this more but, being a fan of "the journalism" my first question of this "journalist" is "According to whom or supported by what?" Is it simply Pete Williams opinion? Did someone whisper in his ear, telling him to say this? Ah now things are coming into focus a little; http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3689493/
To me, this is the crux of the matter: "the Justice Department most likely won't enforce the subpoena" (said the Cheney aid who poses as a reporter). Well, what the F@#$ good are subpoenas if they won't be enforced? |